Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-450
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-450 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Announced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released March 2009
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-330
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-450 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus E-450, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and E-450 (10MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (1/2.3") and E-450 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Fujifilm XP200 was brought out 4 years later than the E-450 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm XP200 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores against the E-450 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-450 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Olympus E-450. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Olympus E-450 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus E-450
Fujifilm XP200 | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2013 | March 2009 | More recent by 49 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Fujifilm XP200
E-450 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus E-450
Fujifilm XP200 | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-450 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 enjoys outer dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus E-450 has proportions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus E-450 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the E-450.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and E-450 is 90 and 77 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-450 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching technical specs. The photograph below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and E-450.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Fujifilm XP200 will render more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XP200 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-450 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-450 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus E-450 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus E-450 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2013-03-22 | 2009-03-31 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 3 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 426 gr (0.94 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 56 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 512 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 500 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $250 | $138 |