Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched April 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-P1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-P3
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Fujifilm XP200 versus Olympus E-P2, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (1/2.3") and E-P2 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Fujifilm XP200 was introduced 2 years later than the E-P2 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm XP200 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades against the E-P2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Olympus PEN E-P2. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus E-P2
Fujifilm XP200 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2013 | April 2010 | Fresher by 36 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Fujifilm XP200
E-P2 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus E-P2
Fujifilm XP200 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 offers outside measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P2 has sizing of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XP200 versus Olympus E-P2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 vs the E-P2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and E-P2 is 90 and 86 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and E-P2.
As you can tell, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XP200 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Fujifilm XP200 will produce more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XP200 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-03-22 | 2010-04-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 355g (0.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 56 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 300 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50A | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $250 | $799 |