Clicky

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs

Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
  • Revealed March 2013
Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Launched April 2010
  • Replaced the Olympus E-P1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-P3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview

In this article, we are contrasting the Fujifilm XP200 versus Olympus E-P2, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (1/2.3") and E-P2 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The Fujifilm XP200 was introduced 2 years later than the E-P2 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm XP200 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades against the E-P2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus E-P2

 Fujifilm XP200 E-P2 
LaunchedMarch 2013April 2010Fresher by 36 months
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Fujifilm XP200

 E-P2 Fujifilm XP200 
Manually focus Dial exact focus

Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus E-P2

 Fujifilm XP200 E-P2 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 offers outside measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P2 has sizing of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm XP200 versus Olympus E-P2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 vs the E-P2.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and E-P2 is 90 and 86 respectively.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and E-P2.

As you can tell, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XP200 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Fujifilm XP200 will produce more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XP200 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Portrait photography details
Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography details
30
megapixel count decent (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
60
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12MP)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Street photography factors
Olympus E-P2 Street photography factors
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Sports photography features
Olympus E-P2 Sports photography features
45
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proof
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
terrible battery pack (300 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Travel photography camera
66
environment proof
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
43
no Time Lapse function
terrible battery pack (300 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Landscape photography details
Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography details
45
reasonably wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
60
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12MP)
terrible battery pack (300 shots)
no Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-P2 Vlogging highlights
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
missing external mic jack
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect focusing
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus E-P2
 Fujifilm FinePix XP200Olympus PEN E-P2
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Olympus PEN E-P2
Category Waterproof Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2013-03-22 2010-04-22
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 11
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.9-4.9 -
Total lenses - 107
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.10 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 232g (0.51 pounds) 355g (0.78 pounds)
Dimensions 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 56
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 505
Other
Battery life 300 photos 300 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50A BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/ SDHC/ SDXC SD/SDHC card
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $250 $799