Fujifilm Z300 vs Kodak Z950
95 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Fujifilm Z300 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.9-6.4) lens
- 155g - 92 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Announced June 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z300 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Fujifilm Z300 vs Kodak Z950, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Z300 (10MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is relatively similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm Z300 was manufactured 12 months earlier than the Z950 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm Z300 being a Ultracompact camera and the Kodak Z950 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm Z300 scores against the Z950 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Z300 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Z300 & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z300 Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z300 over the Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm Z300 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Fujifilm Z300
| Z950 | Fujifilm Z300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 |  | June 2009 | Newer by 12 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z300 and Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm Z300 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z300 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Z300 has physical dimensions of 92mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Kodak Z950 has proportions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Z300 vs Kodak Z950 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm Z300 compared to the Z950.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z300 and Z950 is 95 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm Z300 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specs. The pic underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z300 and Z950.
All in all, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Kodak Z950 to deliver extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Z300 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Fujifilm Z300 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z300 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z300 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-06-12 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-6.4 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 9cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 1/8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1250s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 243g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 57 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple Timer, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $0 | $250 |
