Clicky

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
20
Overall
27
Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Fujifilm Z33WP
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced July 2009
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Launched February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Here is a complete analysis of the Fujifilm Z33WP versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the Fujifilm Z33WP (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The Fujifilm Z33WP was released 5 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm Z33WP being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm Z33WP grades against the DP2 Quattro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 Fujifilm Z33WP DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Fujifilm Z33WP

 DP2 Quattro Fujifilm Z33WP 
LaunchedFebruary 2014July 2009Fresher by 56 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 Fujifilm Z33WP DP2 Quattro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Z33WP provides outer dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Examine the Fujifilm Z33WP versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z33WP and DP2 Quattro is 96 and 70 respectively.

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The visual underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z33WP and DP2 Quattro.

To sum up, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm Z33WP featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will produce more detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z33WP will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP Portrait photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography details
19
no manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
77
you can focus manually
MP count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focus
supports RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP as a Street photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
60
weather proofing
lighter than average in class (110g)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
61
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP Sports photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography highlights
23
weather proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
48
MP count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP Travel photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography features
60
lighter than average in class (110 grams)
weather proofing
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.7)
53
MP count decent (20MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP Landscape photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography factors
26
weather proofing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
59
you can focus manually
decent sized screen (3")
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm Z33WP
Vlogging with Sigma DP2 Quattro
25
lighter than average in class (110g)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.7)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic port
9
can't record video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Z33WP and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Fujifilm FinePix Z33WPSigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Sigma
Model Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-07-01 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 45mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 8cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.90 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 110 gr (0.24 lbs) 395 gr (0.87 lbs)
Dimensions 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-45 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $197 $931