Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus E-M10 II
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm Z35 versus Olympus E-M10 II, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the Fujifilm Z35 (1/2.3") and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%The Fujifilm Z35 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the E-M10 II and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm Z35 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm Z35 scores vs the E-M10 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Olympus E-M10 II
Fujifilm Z35 | E-M10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Fujifilm Z35
E-M10 II | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | July 2009 | Fresher by 74 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus E-M10 II
Fujifilm Z35 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z35 has got exterior dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 II has specifications of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Z35 versus Olympus E-M10 II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 and the E-M10 II.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z35 and E-M10 II is 95 and 82 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z35 and E-M10 II.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm Z35 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-M10 II will deliver extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2015-08-25 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | - |
Macro focusing range | 8cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 3 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 390g (0.86 pounds) |
Dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-45A | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $130 | $499 |