Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Fujifilm Z35 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm Z35 was introduced 5 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm Z35 matches up against the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Fujifilm Z35 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Fujifilm Z35
| WG-4 GPS | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 55 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Fujifilm Z35 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z35 enjoys outer measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Z35 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 versus the WG-4 GPS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z35 and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The graphic below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z35 and WG-4 GPS.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to deliver extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 3 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $130 | $210 |
