Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony H200
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
67 Imaging
45 Features
31 Overall
39
Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Revealed January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony H200 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony H200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and H200 (20MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm Z35 was released 4 years before the H200 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm Z35 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm Z35 grades versus the H200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony H200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Sony H200
| Fujifilm Z35 | H200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Fujifilm Z35
| H200 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 42 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Sony H200
| Fujifilm Z35 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z35 enjoys outer measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony H200 has dimensions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony H200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 and the H200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z35 and H200 is 95 and 67 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The picture underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Z35 and H200.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Sony H200 to show more detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z35 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 3 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 530g (1.17 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery format | - | AA |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $130 | $250 |
