Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus E-M1X
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
54 Imaging
62 Features
93 Overall
74
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Introduced April 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Fujifilm Z900EXR versus Olympus E-M1X, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and the E-M1X (20MP) is fairly similar but the Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") and E-M1X (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor size.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe Fujifilm Z900EXR was announced 8 years prior to the E-M1X and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm Z900EXR being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm Z900EXR grades versus the E-M1X for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR & Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery & Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Olympus E-M1X
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | E-M1X | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
| E-M1X | Fujifilm Z900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2019 |  | April 2011 | More recent by 95 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and Olympus E-M1X
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | E-M1X | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z900EXR has external dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1X has dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Z900EXR versus Olympus E-M1X in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm Z900EXR compared to the E-M1X.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and E-M1X is 95 and 54 respectively.
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and E-M1X.
Clearly, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm Z900EXR with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus E-M1X will offer you more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z900EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
| Category | Ultracompact | Pro Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2011-04-05 | 2019-01-24 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | Dual TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 121 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 grams (0.33 pounds) | 997 grams (2.20 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | 870 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Built-in |
| Battery model | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | Two |
| Launch cost | $380 | $2,999 |
