Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-300
61 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2015
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-300 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus E-300, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the Fujifilm S9900w (1/2.3") and E-300 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm S9900w was revealed 10 years later than the E-300 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9900w being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm S9900w scores against the E-300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus E-300. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm S9900w Gallery and Olympus E-300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Olympus E-300
Fujifilm S9900w | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2015 | January 2005 | Fresher by 122 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 134k | Sharper screen (+326k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Fujifilm S9900w
E-300 | Fujifilm S9900w |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus E-300
Fujifilm S9900w | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S9900w features outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-300 has proportions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus E-300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w compared to the E-300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9900w and E-300 is 61 and 67 respectively.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The visual here will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9900w and E-300.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm S9900w with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Fujifilm S9900w will give you extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S9900w should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-300 Specifications
Fujifilm S9900w | Olympus E-300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm S9900w | Olympus E-300 |
Otherwise known as | - | EVOLT E-300 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2015-01-14 | 2005-01-10 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 8 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3264 x 2448 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 45 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 1.8 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 134k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670g (1.48 pounds) | 624g (1.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $719 | $800 |