Clicky

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus 8010

Portability
61
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45
Fujifilm S9900w front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9900w
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Introduced January 2015
Olympus 8010
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
  • Revealed February 2010
  • Also referred to as mju Tough 8010
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus 8010 Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus 8010, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and 8010 (13MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

The Fujifilm S9900w was manufactured 5 years after the 8010 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9900w being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm S9900w grades versus the 8010 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Olympus 8010

 Fujifilm S9900w 8010 
RevealedJanuary 2015February 2010Newer by 61 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Fujifilm S9900w

 8010 Fujifilm S9900w 

Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus 8010

 Fujifilm S9900w 8010 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9900w offers external measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8010 has dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus 8010 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w vs the 8010.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus 8010 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9900w and 8010 is 61 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading specs. The pic below will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9900w and 8010.

All in all, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Fujifilm S9900w to deliver more detail due to its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S9900w provides an edge in sensor technology.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w Portrait photography factors
Olympus 8010 Portrait photography factors
44
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
28
decent megapixels (13 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w Street photography details
Olympus 8010 Street photography details
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (245g)
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm S9900w
Sports photography with Olympus 8010
53
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (13 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proof
slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w Travel photography factors
Olympus 8010 Travel photography factors
61
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
64
weather proof
decent megapixels (13MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (245 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w Landscape photography details
Olympus 8010 Landscape photography details
50
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
40
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (13 megapixels)
weather proof
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 8010 as a Vlogging camera
57
really wide (24mm)
display is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
27
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (245g)
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus 8010 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus 8010
 Fujifilm S9900wOlympus Stylus Tough 8010
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm S9900w Olympus Stylus Tough 8010
Also called - mju Tough 8010
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Introduced 2015-01-14 2010-02-02
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 13 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 12800 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance 7cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 920 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 1/4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1700 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 10.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670 grams (1.48 lbs) 245 grams (0.54 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID 4 x AA Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $719 $600