Clicky

Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB700

Portability
61
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45
Fujifilm S9900w front
 
Samsung WB700 front
Portability
98
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9900w
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Introduced January 2015
Samsung WB700
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
  • Released December 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB700 Overview

Below is a in depth analysis of the Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB700, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The Fujifilm S9900w was revealed 4 years later than the WB700 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9900w being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm S9900w matches up vs the WB700 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Samsung WB700

 Fujifilm S9900w WB700 
ReleasedJanuary 2015December 2010More recent by 50 months
Manually focus More accurate focus
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Fujifilm S9900w

 WB700 Fujifilm S9900w 
Display resolution614k460kClearer display (+154k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Samsung WB700

 Fujifilm S9900w WB700 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9900w features outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB700 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w compared to the WB700.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB700 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9900w and WB700 is 61 and 98 respectively.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB700 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The graphic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9900w and WB700.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Fujifilm S9900w to render extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S9900w will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB700 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB700 Portrait photography factors
44
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
has face detect autofocus
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
30
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w Street photography highlights
Samsung WB700 Street photography highlights
41
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than average (670 grams)
49
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
low max ISO (0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB700 as a Sports photography camera
53
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
has tracking focus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
28
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S9900w
Travel photography with Samsung WB700
61
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
heavier than average (670 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
70
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB700 Landscape photography factors
50
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
38
good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is decent (3")
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
lacks RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm S9900w
Vlogging with Samsung WB700
57
relatively wide (24mm)
selfie friendly display
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
missing mic port
heavier than average (670g)
27
good maximum aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB700 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9900w and Samsung WB700
 Fujifilm S9900wSamsung WB700
General Information
Make FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm S9900w Samsung WB700
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2015-01-14 2010-12-28
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 -
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) ()
Highest aperture f/2.9-6.5 -
Macro focus distance 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460k dot 614k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 920k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1700 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 10.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) -
Flash modes Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 grams (1.48 lbs) -
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $719 $300