Clicky

Fujifilm X-E2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS

Portability
85
Imaging
59
Features
73
Overall
64
Fujifilm X-E2 front
 
Olympus TG-630 iHS front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35

Fujifilm X-E2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs

Fujifilm X-E2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 350g - 129 x 75 x 37mm
  • Released March 2014
  • Previous Model is Fujifilm X-E1
  • Successor is Fujifilm X-E2S
Olympus TG-630 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm X-E2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm X-E2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-E2 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-E2 (APS-C) and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Fujifilm X-E2 was brought out 15 months after the TG-630 iHS which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X-E2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm X-E2 grades versus the TG-630 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-E2 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS

 Fujifilm X-E2 TG-630 iHS 
RevealedMarch 2014January 2013Newer by 15 months
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Screen resolution1040k460kSharper screen (+580k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Fujifilm X-E2

 TG-630 iHS Fujifilm X-E2 

Common features in the Fujifilm X-E2 and Olympus TG-630 iHS

 Fujifilm X-E2 TG-630 iHS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm X-E2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison

When you are intending to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-E2 offers outer dimensions of 129mm x 75mm x 37mm (5.1" x 3.0" x 1.5") and a weight of 350 grams (0.77 lbs) while the Olympus TG-630 iHS has specifications of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Examine the Fujifilm X-E2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X-E2 compared to the TG-630 iHS.

Fujifilm X-E2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-E2 and TG-630 iHS is 85 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm X-E2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-E2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-E2 and TG-630 iHS.

Clearly, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-E2 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-E2 will render greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X-E2 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm X-E2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-E2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-E2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-E2 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-630 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
75
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
27
offers face detect focusing
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Fujifilm X-E2 Street photography advice
Olympus TG-630 iHS Street photography advice
66
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X-E2 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-630 iHS as a Sports photography camera
69
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking focus
has phase detect autofocus
lack of image stabilization
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
weather sealing
slow fps (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (220 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm X-E2
Travel photography with Olympus TG-630 iHS
72
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
59
weather sealing
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
terrible battery pack (220 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-E2 Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-630 iHS Landscape photography info
74
has manual focus
swap lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
39
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
terrible battery pack (220 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm X-E2
Vlogging with Olympus TG-630 iHS
34
provides face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has mic port
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm X-E2 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-E2 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
 Fujifilm X-E2Olympus TG-630 iHS
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm X-E2 Olympus TG-630 iHS
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2014-03-05 2013-01-08
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR Processor II -
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS II CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 368.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4896 x 3264 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 49 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Fujifilm X fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 54 -
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 7.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.00 m (@ ISO 200) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 350 gr (0.77 lbs) 167 gr (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 129 x 75 x 37mm (5.1" x 3.0" x 1.5") 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 220 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model W126 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Price at release $450 $200