Fujifilm X-H1 vs Ricoh GR II
61 Imaging
69 Features
85 Overall
75
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 673g - 140 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Renewed by Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh GR
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Fujifilm X-H1 versus Ricoh GR II, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) and GR II (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (APS-C).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm X-H1 was brought out 2 years later than the GR II and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-H1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm X-H1 grades vs the GR II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-H1 and Ricoh GR II. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-H1 Gallery and Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H1 over the Ricoh GR II
Fujifilm X-H1 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | June 2015 | More recent by 33 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Fujifilm X-H1
GR II | Fujifilm X-H1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 1040k | Sharper display (+190k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H1 and Ricoh GR II
Fujifilm X-H1 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-H1 offers outer measurements of 140mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Ricoh GR II has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-H1 versus Ricoh GR II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 compared to the GR II.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-H1 and GR II is 61 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements merely by looking at technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-H1 and GR II.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Fujifilm X-H1 to give extra detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-H1 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Fujifilm X-H1 | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm X-H1 | Ricoh GR II |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2018-02-14 | 2015-06-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | X-Processor Pro | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 325 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 54 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 300 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 14.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 673 grams (1.48 lbs) | 251 grams (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 140 x 97 x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | 320 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at launch | $1,300 | $599 |