Fujifilm X-M1 vs Olympus E-5
87 Imaging
58 Features
63 Overall
60
58 Imaging
48 Features
76 Overall
59
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Olympus E-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 330g - 117 x 67 x 39mm
- Released September 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Announced February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-3
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Olympus E-5 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm X-M1 vs Olympus E-5, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-M1 (16MP) and E-5 (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-M1 (APS-C) and E-5 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor sizing.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe Fujifilm X-M1 was launched 2 years after the E-5 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-M1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm X-M1 matches up against the E-5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Olympus E-5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-M1 and Olympus E-5. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-M1 Gallery and Olympus E-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-M1 over the Olympus E-5
Fujifilm X-M1 | E-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2013 | February 2011 | More modern by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Fujifilm X-M1
E-5 | Fujifilm X-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-M1 and Olympus E-5
Fujifilm X-M1 | E-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Identical screen resolution | |
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Olympus E-5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-M1 enjoys physical measurements of 117mm x 67mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) and the Olympus E-5 has specifications of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X-M1 vs Olympus E-5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-M1 and the E-5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-M1 and E-5 is 87 and 58 respectively.
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Olympus E-5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The image below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-M1 and E-5.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-M1 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-M1 will give greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-M1 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Olympus E-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Olympus E-5 Specifications
Fujifilm X-M1 | Olympus E-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-M1 | Olympus E-5 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2013-09-17 | 2011-02-03 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR Processor II | TruePic V+ |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS I | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 54 | 45 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (ISO200m) | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto / Forced Flash / Suppressed Flash / Slow Synchro / Rear-curtain Synchro / Commander | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 30p, Continuous recording: up to approx. 14 min./1280 x 720 30p, Continuous recording: up to approx. 27 min. | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 330 gr (0.73 lb) | 800 gr (1.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 67 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 56 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 519 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 870 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W126 | BLM-5 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec.) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD memory card / SDHC memory card / SDXC (UHS-I) memory card | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | Two |
Cost at release | $399 | $1,700 |