Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
78 Imaging
71 Features
81 Overall
75
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 497g - 141 x 83 x 46mm
- Released October 2019
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-Pro2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Fujifilm X-Pro3 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 (26MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-Pro3 (APS-C) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm X-Pro3 was revealed 6 years after the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-Pro3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-Pro3 matches up against the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-Pro3 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm X-Pro3 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-Pro3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2019 | December 2012 | More modern by 84 months | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 920k | Sharper screen (+700k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Fujifilm X-Pro3
XZ-2 iHS | Fujifilm X-Pro3 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-Pro3 provides physical dimensions of 141mm x 83mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm X-Pro3 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and XZ-2 iHS is 78 and 85 respectively.
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The pic below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-Pro3 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm X-Pro3 will give greater detail because of its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-Pro3 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2019-10-23 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | X-Processor 4 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 54 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,620 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
Dimensions | 141 x 83 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W126 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Price at launch | $2,000 | $450 |