Clicky

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus E-3

Portability
52
Imaging
38
Features
55
Overall
44
Fujifilm X-S1 front
 
Olympus E-3 front
Portability
56
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus E-3 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-S1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-624mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 920g - 135 x 107 x 149mm
  • Announced November 2011
Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Released February 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-5
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus E-3 Overview

Following is a in-depth review of the Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus E-3, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X-S1 (12MP) and the E-3 (10MP) is relatively close but the Fujifilm X-S1 (2/3") and E-3 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm X-S1 was manufactured 3 years after the E-3 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X-S1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm X-S1 matches up vs the E-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S1 over the Olympus E-3

 Fujifilm X-S1 E-3 
ReleasedNovember 2011February 2008More modern by 46 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Fujifilm X-S1

 E-3 Fujifilm X-S1 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Fujifilm X-S1 and Olympus E-3

 Fujifilm X-S1 E-3 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus E-3 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-S1 has outside measurements of 135mm x 107mm x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") along with a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-3 has dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus E-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X-S1 against the E-3.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus E-3 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-S1 and E-3 is 52 and 56 respectively.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus E-3 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus E-3 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-S1 and E-3.

As you can tell, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-S1 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Fujifilm X-S1 will render greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-S1 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus E-3 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus E-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus E-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-3 as a Portrait photography camera
46
focusing manually
provides face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (2/3")
57
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
resolution not great (10MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Street photography advice
Olympus E-3 Street photography advice
52
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
small sensor (2/3")
more heavy than competition in class (920g)
70
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
weather proofing
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-3 as a Sports photography camera
44
great zoom range (24-624mm 26.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (2/3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
58
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
weather proofing
supports phase detect AF
max frames per second low (5.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Travel photography features
Olympus E-3 Travel photography features
43
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great zoom (624mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (920 grams)
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
55
weather proofing
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
no Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (10MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-3 as a Landscape photography camera
45
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (2/3")
does not have Timelapse mode
56
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
weather proofing
small screen (2.5")
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
no Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Vlogging factors
Olympus E-3 Vlogging factors
26
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes external microphone support
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than competition in class (920g)
18
no video
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus E-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-S1 and Olympus E-3
 Fujifilm X-S1Olympus E-3
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm X-S1 Olympus E-3
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Announced 2011-11-24 2008-02-20
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip EXR TruePic III
Sensor type EXRCMOS CMOS
Sensor size 2/3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 8.8 x 6.6mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 58.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 49 11
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 24-624mm (26.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.8-5.6 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 45
Crop factor 4.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Tilting Fully Articulated
Display sizing 3 inch 2.5 inch
Display resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.58x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/8000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 8.00 m 13.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 920 grams (2.03 lb) 890 grams (1.96 lb)
Physical dimensions 135 x 107 x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 56
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 21.6
DXO Dynamic range score 11.2 10.5
DXO Low light score 216 571
Other
Battery model NP-95 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $399 $670