Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-400
73 Imaging
72 Features
88 Overall
78
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 465g - 126 x 85 x 65mm
- Announced October 2020
- Replacement is Fujifilm X-S20
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-400 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Fujifilm X-S10 versus Olympus E-400, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-S10 (26MP) and E-400 (10MP) and the Fujifilm X-S10 (APS-C) and E-400 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm X-S10 was manufactured 14 years later than the E-400 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X-S10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm X-S10 grades vs the E-400 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-400 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-400. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm X-S10 Gallery and Olympus E-400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S10 over the Olympus E-400
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2020 | September 2006 | More recent by 172 months | |
Display type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 215k | Crisper display (+825k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Fujifilm X-S10
E-400 | Fujifilm X-S10 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-400
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing |
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-400 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-S10 features physical measurements of 126mm x 85mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") and a weight of 465 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus E-400 has proportions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-S10 versus Olympus E-400 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-S10 against the E-400.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-400 is 73 and 77 respectively.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-400 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through specifications. The visual here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-400.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-S10 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm X-S10 will result in extra detail due to its extra 16MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X-S10 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-400 Specifications
Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus E-400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus E-400 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2020-10-15 | 2006-09-14 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 54 | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 215 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 20.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 465 gr (1.03 lbs) | 435 gr (0.96 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 126 x 85 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I supported) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $999 | $599 |