Clicky

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 IV

Portability
79
Imaging
60
Features
76
Overall
66
Fujifilm X-T1 IR front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
Portability
81
Imaging
63
Features
83
Overall
71

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 IV Key Specs

Fujifilm X-T1 IR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 51200)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 440g - 129 x 90 x 47mm
  • Launched August 2015
Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Introduced August 2020
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 IV Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M10 IV, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (20MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm X-T1 IR (APS-C) and E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm X-T1 IR was manufactured 6 years prior to the E-M10 IV which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T1 IR scores versus the E-M10 IV with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T1 IR over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 Fujifilm X-T1 IR E-M10 IV 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Fujifilm X-T1 IR

 E-M10 IV Fujifilm X-T1 IR 
IntroducedAugust 2020August 2015More modern by 60 months
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M10 IV

 Fujifilm X-T1 IR E-M10 IV 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Display resolution1040k1040kIdentical display resolution

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 IV Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-T1 IR offers outside dimensions of 129mm x 90mm x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") with a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 IV has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M10 IV in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and the E-M10 IV.

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 IV size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and E-M10 IV is 79 and 81 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 IV top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 IV Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The picture here will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and E-M10 IV.

As you have seen, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T1 IR due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 IV will offer extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X-T1 IR is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 IV sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-M10 IV as a Portrait photography camera
76
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
77
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm X-T1 IR
Street photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
75
has a tilting screen
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
no image stabilization
84
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
offers touch focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR Sports photography info
Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography info
65
silent mode (1/32,000s)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
weather sealing
has phase detect AF
no image stabilization
bad battery life (350 CIPA)
73
silent mode (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
lack of phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR Travel photography factors
Olympus E-M10 IV Travel photography factors
63
weather sealing
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
bad battery life (350 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
85
supports bluetooth
offers touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography highlights
71
has manual focus
change lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
does not have low pass filter
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
no image stabilization
bad battery life (350 per charge)
83
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-M10 IV as a Vlogging camera
33
has face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has external microphone support
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
78
display is selfie friendly
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focusing
good video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M10 IV
 Fujifilm X-T1 IROlympus OM-D E-M10 IV
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm X-T1 IR Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV
Category Advanced Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2015-08-03 2020-08-04
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR Processor II TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS II CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.6mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 368.2mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4896 x 3264 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 6400 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO 51200 -
Min native ISO 200 200
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO 100 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 121
Lens
Lens mounting type Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 54 107
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,040k dot 1,040k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.77x 0.62x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000s 1/16000s
Continuous shutter speed 8.0fps 8.7fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 8.00 m (ISO 100) 7.20 m (at ISO 200)
Flash settings Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Synchro, Suppressed Flash, Rear-curtain Synchro, Commander Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 60p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 60p) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 440 gr (0.97 pounds) 383 gr (0.84 pounds)
Dimensions 129 x 90 x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 360 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-W126 BLS-50
Self timer Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II) SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported)
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $1,299 $699