Clicky

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus VH-410

Portability
79
Imaging
60
Features
76
Overall
66
Fujifilm X-T1 IR front
 
Olympus VH-410 front
Portability
95
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-T1 IR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 51200)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 440g - 129 x 90 x 47mm
  • Introduced August 2015
Olympus VH-410
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced August 2012
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus VH-410 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus VH-410, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR (16MP) and the VH-410 (16MP) is very close but the Fujifilm X-T1 IR (APS-C) and VH-410 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.

Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

The Fujifilm X-T1 IR was manufactured 2 years after the VH-410 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm X-T1 IR being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm X-T1 IR scores versus the VH-410 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T1 IR over the Olympus VH-410

 Fujifilm X-T1 IR VH-410 
IntroducedAugust 2015August 2012Newer by 36 months
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k460kSharper display (+580k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Fujifilm X-T1 IR

 VH-410 Fujifilm X-T1 IR 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus VH-410

 Fujifilm X-T1 IR VH-410 
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-T1 IR offers physical dimensions of 129mm x 90mm x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") and a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs) while the Olympus VH-410 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check the Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus VH-410 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and the VH-410.

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and VH-410 is 79 and 95 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The image below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and VH-410.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical megapixel count but different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T1 IR offers the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallower DOF easier. The more modern Fujifilm X-T1 IR should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR Portrait photography info
Olympus VH-410 Portrait photography info
76
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect focusing
supports RAW files
35
decent megapixels (16MP)
features face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm X-T1 IR
Street photography with Olympus VH-410
75
has a tilting screen
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
no image stabilization
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
boasts touch to focus
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VH-410 as a Sports photography camera
65
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
MP count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
environment sealing
comes with phase detect AF
no image stabilization
bad battery pack (350 CIPA)
41
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR Travel photography highlights
Olympus VH-410 Travel photography highlights
63
environment sealing
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
bad battery pack (350 CIPA)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
68
boasts touch to focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm X-T1 IR
Landscape photography with Olympus VH-410
71
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
doesnt have low pass filter
supports RAW files
environment sealing
no image stabilization
bad battery pack (350 per charge)
43
rather wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VH-410 as a Vlogging camera
33
features face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have microphone socket
does not posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
33
rather wide (26mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus VH-410
 Fujifilm X-T1 IROlympus VH-410
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm X-T1 IR Olympus VH-410
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2015-08-03 2012-08-21
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR Processor II TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS II CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 368.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4896 x 3264 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 51200 -
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type Fujifilm X fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus range - 5cm
Number of lenses 54 -
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.77x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter rate 8.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 8.00 m (ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Synchro, Suppressed Flash, Rear-curtain Synchro, Commander Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 60p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 60p) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 440g (0.97 lbs) 152g (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 129 x 90 x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-W126 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Price at release $1,299 $186