Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB350F
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Introduced January 2020
- Older Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Its time to look closer at the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Samsung WB350F, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and WB350F (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe Fujifilm X-T200 was manufactured 6 years later than the WB350F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades vs the WB350F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-T200 & Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Samsung WB350F
Fujifilm X-T200 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2020 | January 2014 | Fresher by 74 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 2780k | 460k | Sharper display (+2320k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Fujifilm X-T200
WB350F | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Samsung WB350F
Fujifilm X-T200 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-T200 has got outside measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 and the WB350F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-T200 and WB350F is 80 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T200 and WB350F.
Clearly, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T200 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T200 will resolve more detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-T200 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Samsung WB350F |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2020-01-22 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 425 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Total lenses | 54 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 2,780 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 lb) | 276g (0.61 lb) |
Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-W126S | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $699 | $260 |