Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
71 Imaging
70 Features
88 Overall
77
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 539g - 133 x 93 x 59mm
- Introduced September 2018
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T2
- New Model is Fujifilm X-T4
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Fujifilm X-T3 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T3 (26MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T3 (APS-C) and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm X-T3 was brought out 4 years later than the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-T3 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T3 scores vs the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T3 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T3 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T3 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Fujifilm X-T3 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2018 | February 2014 | Fresher by 56 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Fujifilm X-T3
WG-4 GPS | Fujifilm X-T3 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T3 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Fujifilm X-T3 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T3 features physical dimensions of 133mm x 93mm x 59mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 539 grams (1.19 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X-T3 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-T3 and the WG-4 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-T3 and WG-4 GPS is 71 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The graphic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T3 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T3 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-T3 will offer extra detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-T3 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Fujifilm X-T3 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm X-T3 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2018-09-06 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | X-Processor 4 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 160 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 54 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 20.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096x2160 (60p/50p/30p/25p/24p/23.98p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 539 gr (1.19 lbs) | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 133 x 93 x 59mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.3") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 images | 240 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Price at release | $1,500 | $210 |