Fujifilm X-T5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
70 Imaging
77 Features
89 Overall
81
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Fujifilm X-T5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 6240 x 4160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 557g - 130 x 91 x 64mm
- Launched November 2022
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-T4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
Fujifilm X-T5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Fujifilm X-T5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T5 (40MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the Fujifilm X-T5 (APS-C) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm X-T5 was announced 12 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X-T5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm X-T5 scores versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-T5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-T5 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T5 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Fujifilm X-T5 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2022 | March 2010 | More modern by 154 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1840k | 920k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Fujifilm X-T5
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Fujifilm X-T5 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Fujifilm X-T5 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3.00" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-T5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T5 enjoys exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 64mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.5") having a weight of 557 grams (1.23 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-T5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T5 against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T5 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 70 and 85 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching technical specs. The pic here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T5 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T5 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T5 will result in greater detail with its extra 30 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-T5 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-T5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Fujifilm X-T5 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm X-T5 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-11-02 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 82 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,840 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 180s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/180000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 15.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 6240 x 4160 @ 30p /4096x2160 (60p/50p/30p/25p/24p/23.98p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 6240x4160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 557 grams (1.23 pounds) | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 64mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.5") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 580 pictures | 410 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W235 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC card slots (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Cost at launch | $1,699 | $349 |