Fujifilm X100S vs Leica M Typ 240
80 Imaging
58 Features
50 Overall
54
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
Fujifilm X100S vs Leica M Typ 240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 445g - 127 x 74 x 54mm
- Announced July 2013
- Old Model is Fujifilm X100
- Later Model is Fujifilm X100T
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released September 2012
Fujifilm X100S vs Leica M Typ 240 Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Fujifilm X100S versus Leica M Typ 240, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Leica. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X100S (16MP) and M Typ 240 (24MP) and the Fujifilm X100S (APS-C) and M Typ 240 (Full frame) posses different sensor dimensions.
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuitThe Fujifilm X100S was announced 11 months later than the M Typ 240 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X100S being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm X100S grades versus the M Typ 240 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm X100S vs Leica M Typ 240 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X100S & Leica M Typ 240. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X100S Gallery & Leica M Typ 240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X100S over the Leica M Typ 240
Fujifilm X100S | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2013 | September 2012 | More recent by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Fujifilm X100S
M Typ 240 | Fujifilm X100S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm X100S and Leica M Typ 240
Fujifilm X100S | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm X100S vs Leica M Typ 240 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X100S features physical measurements of 127mm x 74mm x 54mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Leica M Typ 240 has measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X100S versus Leica M Typ 240 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X100S compared to the M Typ 240.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X100S and M Typ 240 is 80 and 74 respectively.
Fujifilm X100S vs Leica M Typ 240 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X100S and M Typ 240.
Clearly, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X100S with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Leica M Typ 240 will give greater detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X100S should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X100S vs Leica M Typ 240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X100S vs Leica M Typ 240 Specifications
Fujifilm X100S | Leica M Typ 240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Leica |
Model | Fujifilm X100S | Leica M Typ 240 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-07-29 | 2012-09-17 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 372.9mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 5952 x 3976 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Leica M |
Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0 | - |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,350 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 90% | 1% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 445g (0.98 lb) | 680g (1.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 127 x 74 x 54mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.1") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 84 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1860 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 500 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-95 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,299 | $5,479 |