Clicky

Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
80 Imaging
58 Features
50 Overall
54
Fujifilm X100S front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38

Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Fujifilm X100S
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 445g - 127 x 74 x 54mm
  • Launched July 2013
  • Earlier Model is Fujifilm X100
  • Refreshed by Fujifilm X100T
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Introduced March 2010
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Its time to look closer at the Fujifilm X100S versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X100S (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the Fujifilm X100S (APS-C) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizes.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The Fujifilm X100S was unveiled 3 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm X100S being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm X100S matches up versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X100S over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 Fujifilm X100S GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
IntroducedJuly 2013March 2010More modern by 41 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Fujifilm X100S

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Fujifilm X100S 
Screen size3"2.8"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 Fujifilm X100S GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Manually focus  More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch screen  Absent Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X100S enjoys exterior dimensions of 127mm x 74mm x 54mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X100S versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X100S vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X100S and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 80 and 85 respectively.
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X100S and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Plainly, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X100S having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm X100S will offer you extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X100S will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
	
			Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm X100S Portrait photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography info
74
 you can focus manually
 high flash sync (1/2,000 seconds)
 MP count good (16MP)
 good sensor size (APS-C)
 supports RAW files
36
 manual focus
 delivers RAW formats
 no liveview
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 very small sensor (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
 Fujifilm X100S as a Street photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
64
 good sensor size (APS-C)
 supports RAW files
 no articulating screen
 lack of image stabilization
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW formats
 lighter than competitors (355 grams)
 screen is fixed
 very small sensor (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
 Fujifilm X100S as a Sports photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Sports photography camera
45
 MP count good (16 megapixels)
 good sensor size (APS-C)
 can't change focal length (35mm)
 continuous shooting slow (6.0 fps)
 lack of image stabilization
 does not have phase detect AF
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview
 slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 very small sensor (1/1.7")
 doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm X100S Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography highlights
67
 MP count good (16MP)
 flash built-in
 good maximum aperture (f2.0)
 missing Timelapse function
 does not feature selfie friendly display
60
 lighter than competitors (355g)
 flash built-in
 pretty wide (24mm)
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm X100S Landscape photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography features
63
 you can focus manually
 good maximum aperture (f2.0)
 good sized screen (2.8 inches)
 MP count good (16 megapixels)
 good sensor size (APS-C)
 does not have anti aliasing filter
 supports RAW files
 cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
 can't change focal length (35mm)
 lack of image stabilization
 missing Timelapse function
47
 manual focus
 pretty wide (24mm)
 screen is a decent size (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW formats
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 very small sensor (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm X100S
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
29
 good maximum aperture (f2.0)
 video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 does not feature selfie friendly display
 lack of image stabilization
 missing external microphone jack
28
 pretty wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors (355 grams)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
 does not have external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	

		

			
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Fujifilm X100SRicoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Make FujiFilm Ricoh
Model type Fujifilm X100S Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Large Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2013-07-29 2010-03-18
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR II Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS II CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.8mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 372.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Max resolution 4896 x 3264 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 12800 3200
Max enhanced ISO 25600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch focus    
AF continuous    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
AF live view    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Total focus points 49 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35mm (1x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.0 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focusing range 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 1.5 4.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.8" 3"
Resolution of screen 460k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic and Optical (tunnel) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,350k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 90 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.5x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 180s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 6.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 9.00 m 4.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Fastest flash synchronize 1/2000s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 445 grams (0.98 pounds) 355 grams (0.78 pounds)
Physical dimensions 127 x 74 x 54mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.1") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 pictures 410 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-95 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording    
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $1,299 $349