Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400
80 Imaging
59 Features
63 Overall
60
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 440g - 127 x 74 x 52mm
- Introduced September 2014
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X100S
- New Model is Fujifilm X100F
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Newer Model is Olympus E-410
Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X100T (16MP) and E-400 (10MP) and the Fujifilm X100T (APS-C) and E-400 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm X100T was released 8 years later than the E-400 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X100T being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the Fujifilm X100T scores against the E-400 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X100T & Olympus E-400. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X100T Gallery & Olympus E-400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X100T over the Olympus E-400
Fujifilm X100T | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | September 2006 | Fresher by 98 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 215k | Sharper screen (+825k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Fujifilm X100T
E-400 | Fujifilm X100T |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X100T and Olympus E-400
Fujifilm X100T | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X100T features outer measurements of 127mm x 74mm x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") with a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs) and the Olympus E-400 has dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X100T against the E-400.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X100T and E-400 is 80 and 77 respectively.
Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X100T and E-400.
As you have seen, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X100T featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Fujifilm X100T will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X100T provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Specifications
Fujifilm X100T | Olympus E-400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X100T | Olympus E-400 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2006-09-14 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 372.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0 | - |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 215 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 92% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, forced, suppressed, slow synchro, commander | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 440 gr (0.97 pounds) | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 127 x 74 x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-95 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $899 | $599 |