Clicky

Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400

Portability
80
Imaging
59
Features
63
Overall
60
Fujifilm X100T front
 
Olympus E-400 front
Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38

Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Key Specs

Fujifilm X100T
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 51200)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 440g - 127 x 74 x 52mm
  • Introduced September 2014
  • Previous Model is Fujifilm X100S
  • New Model is Fujifilm X100F
Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced September 2006
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-410
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X100T (16MP) and E-400 (10MP) and the Fujifilm X100T (APS-C) and E-400 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm X100T was released 8 years later than the E-400 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X100T being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the Fujifilm X100T scores against the E-400 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X100T over the Olympus E-400

 Fujifilm X100T E-400 
IntroducedSeptember 2014September 2006Fresher by 98 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1040k215kSharper screen (+825k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Fujifilm X100T

 E-400 Fujifilm X100T 

Common features in the Fujifilm X100T and Olympus E-400

 Fujifilm X100T E-400 
Manual focus More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X100T features outer measurements of 127mm x 74mm x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") with a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs) and the Olympus E-400 has dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).

Check the Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X100T against the E-400.

Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X100T and E-400 is 80 and 77 respectively.

Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X100T and E-400.

As you have seen, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X100T featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Fujifilm X100T will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X100T provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X100T as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-400 as a Portrait photography camera
75
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
46
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no liveview feature
no manual control
megapixel count low (10MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Fujifilm X100T as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-400 as a Street photography camera
64
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
60
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm X100T
Sports photography with Olympus E-400
58
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
fixed focal length (35mm)
slow frames per second (6.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
38
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview feature
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm X100T
Travel photography with Olympus E-400
73
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fast max aperture (f2.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
49
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X100T Landscape photography details
Olympus E-400 Landscape photography details
64
manual focus
fast max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
lack of image stabilization
45
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X100T Vlogging information
Olympus E-400 Vlogging information
35
fast max aperture (f2.0)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes external microphone socket
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
9
lack of video recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm X100T vs Olympus E-400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X100T and Olympus E-400
 Fujifilm X100TOlympus E-400
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm X100T Olympus E-400
Category Large Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2014-09-12 2006-09-14
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor EXR Processor II -
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS II CCD
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.8mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 372.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 4896 x 3264 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Highest boosted ISO 51200 -
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 49 3
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 35mm (1x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.0 -
Macro focus range 10cm -
Available lenses - 45
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 2.5 inches
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dot 215 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic and Optical (tunnel) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 92% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.5x 0.46x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 6.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.00 m (at ISO 1600) 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, forced, suppressed, slow synchro, commander Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 440 gr (0.97 pounds) 435 gr (0.96 pounds)
Physical dimensions 127 x 74 x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-95 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $899 $599