Clicky

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Portability
90
Imaging
38
Features
46
Overall
41
Fujifilm XF1 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs

Fujifilm XF1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2012
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Released February 2014
  • Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview

The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The Fujifilm XF1 was announced 16 months earlier than the WG-4 GPS which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm XF1 scores against the WG-4 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 Fujifilm XF1 WG-4 GPS 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Fujifilm XF1

 WG-4 GPS Fujifilm XF1 
ReleasedFebruary 2014September 2012Newer by 16 months

Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 Fujifilm XF1 WG-4 GPS 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Screen resolution460k460kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XF1 offers outside measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 versus the WG-4 GPS.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XF1 and WG-4 GPS is 90 and 90 respectively.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The pic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XF1 and WG-4 GPS.

All in all, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XF1 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will offer greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm XF1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Portrait photography camera
42
has manual focus
supports face detection focus
supports RAW formats
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (2/3")
41
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography factors
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (2/3")
more heavy than competition (255g)
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competitors (235 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Sports photography camera
31
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (2/3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
45
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
environment sealing
low frames per second (2.0 fps)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery (240 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Travel photography info
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography info
60
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (255g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
69
environment sealing
good MP (16MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
bad battery (240 CIPA)
more heavy than competitors (235 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Landscape photography details
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography details
54
has manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (2/3")
doesn't have Timelapse recording
54
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
environment sealing
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
bad battery (240 per charge)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm XF1
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
34
pretty wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone socket
more heavy than competition (255g)
34
quite wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
no microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (235 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XF1 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
 Fujifilm XF1Ricoh WG-4 GPS
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Ricoh
Model type Fujifilm XF1 Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Announced 2012-09-17 2014-02-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type EXRCMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 58.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Highest boosted ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/1.8-4.9 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 460 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 7.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 255 gr (0.56 lbs) 235 gr (0.52 lbs)
Dimensions 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 199 not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots One One
Retail price $380 $210