Clicky

Fujifilm XF10 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
88
Imaging
69
Features
64
Overall
67
Fujifilm XF10 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Fujifilm XF10 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Fujifilm XF10
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 279g - 113 x 64 x 41mm
  • Revealed July 2018
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Also referred to as PL50
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm XF10 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Fujifilm XF10 and Samsung SL202, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XF10 (24MP) and SL202 (10MP) and the Fujifilm XF10 (APS-C) and SL202 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm XF10 was brought out 9 years after the SL202 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm XF10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm XF10 grades versus the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF10 over the Samsung SL202

 Fujifilm XF10 SL202 
LaunchedJuly 2018February 2009More modern by 115 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kClearer display (+810k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm XF10

 SL202 Fujifilm XF10 

Common features in the Fujifilm XF10 and Samsung SL202

 Fujifilm XF10 SL202 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Fujifilm XF10 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XF10 has got exterior measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 279 grams (0.62 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm XF10 and Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XF10 compared to the SL202.

Fujifilm XF10 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XF10 and SL202 is 88 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm XF10 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XF10 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The image here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XF10 and SL202.

Plainly, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XF10 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm XF10 will provide you with extra detail having its extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XF10 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm XF10 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XF10 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XF10 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XF10 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography highlights
74
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
offers face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
external flash not possible
25
offers face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XF10 Street photography advice
Samsung SL202 Street photography advice
76
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
features focus via touch
lighter than competition in class (279 grams)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XF10 Sports photography factors
Samsung SL202 Sports photography factors
65
silent shooting (1/16,000s)
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
supports phase detect autofocus
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
16
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm XF10
Travel photography with Samsung SL202
77
lighter than competition in class (279 grams)
has bluetooth
features focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
flash built-in
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
57
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XF10 Landscape photography advice
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography advice
64
focusing manually
screen size is decent (3")
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
27
decently wide (28mm)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7")
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XF10 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung SL202 as a Vlogging camera
37
built-in touchscreen
offers face detect autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
comes with microphone support
lighter than competition in class (279 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
27
decently wide (28mm)
offers face detection focus
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm XF10 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XF10 and Samsung SL202
 Fujifilm XF10Samsung SL202
General Information
Company FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm XF10 Samsung SL202
Also called - PL50
Class Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2018-07-19 2009-02-17
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 6000 x 4000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 12800 1600
Max enhanced ISO 51200 -
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 91 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus distance 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Max quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter speed 6.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.30 m (at ISO 100) 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro, Rear-curtain Synchro, Commander Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 15p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 279g (0.62 lbs) 168g (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 113 x 64 x 41mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.6") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $500 $140