Fujifilm XQ1 vs Ricoh PX
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched November 2013
- Successor is Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2011
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Ricoh PX Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Ricoh PX, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and PX (16MP) and the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and PX (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XQ1 was released 2 years after the PX which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm XQ1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm XQ1 grades versus the PX with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm XQ1 and Ricoh PX. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery and Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Ricoh PX
Fujifilm XQ1 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2013 | August 2011 | More modern by 28 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Fujifilm XQ1
PX | Fujifilm XQ1 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Ricoh PX
Fujifilm XQ1 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm XQ1 enjoys outer dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh PX has specifications of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Ricoh PX in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 and the PX.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XQ1 and PX is 92 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The pic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XQ1 and PX.
To sum up, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XQ1 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Ricoh PX will give greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XQ1 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
Fujifilm XQ1 | Ricoh PX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm XQ1 | Ricoh PX |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-11-26 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3072 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.9-5.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 12.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 156g (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-48 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $500 | $329 |