Hasselblad X1D vs Nikon S5100
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
95 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Hasselblad X1D vs Nikon S5100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2016
- Newer Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.7-6.6) lens
- 132g - 97 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced August 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Hasselblad X1D vs Nikon S5100 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Hasselblad X1D and Nikon S5100, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Hasselblad and Nikon. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and S5100 (12MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and S5100 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe X1D was released 5 years after the S5100 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Nikon S5100 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the X1D matches up vs the S5100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Hasselblad X1D vs Nikon S5100 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D & Nikon Coolpix S5100. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Nikon S5100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Nikon S5100
| X1D | S5100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2016 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 72 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Nikon S5100 over the Hasselblad X1D
| S5100 | X1D |
|---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Nikon S5100
| X1D | S5100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Nikon S5100 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D offers physical dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Nikon S5100 has specifications of 97mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X1D and Nikon S5100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the X1D vs the S5100.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and S5100 is 60 and 95 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Nikon S5100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D and S5100.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D due to its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Hasselblad X1D will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 39 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern X1D is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D vs Nikon S5100 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Hasselblad X1D vs Nikon S5100 Specifications
| Hasselblad X1D | Nikon Coolpix S5100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Hasselblad | Nikon |
| Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Nikon Coolpix S5100 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2016-06-22 | 2010-08-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Medium format | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.7-6.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
| Total lenses | 4 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.3 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 132 grams (0.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 97 x 57 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 102 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | EN-EL10 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Two | One |
| Retail price | $6,495 | $200 |
