Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2016
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Announced January 2012
- Superseded the Olympus SP-610UZ
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus SP-620 UZ, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's DominanceThe X1D was launched 4 years after the SP-620 UZ which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief summation of how the X1D matches up vs the SP-620 UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D & Olympus SP-620 UZ. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
X1D | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2016 | January 2012 | Newer by 55 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Hasselblad X1D
SP-620 UZ | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Olympus SP-620 UZ
X1D | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D provides outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus SP-620 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus SP-620 UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the X1D against the SP-620 UZ.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the X1D and SP-620 UZ is 60 and 78 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The picture here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and SP-620 UZ.
As you can see, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The X1D because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger X1D provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-06-22 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Medium format | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 4 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 435 grams (0.96 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Price at launch | $6,495 | $199 |