Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2016
- New Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Hasselblad X1D versus Olympus TG-850 iHS, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe X1D was revealed 2 years after the TG-850 iHS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the X1D matches up against the TG-850 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
X1D | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2016 | January 2014 | Newer by 30 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Hasselblad X1D
TG-850 iHS | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Olympus TG-850 iHS
X1D | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D comes with exterior dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus TG-850 iHS has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Hasselblad X1D versus Olympus TG-850 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the X1D versus the TG-850 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the X1D and TG-850 iHS is 60 and 91 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D and TG-850 iHS.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The X1D having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will provide more detail because of its extra 35MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent X1D provides an edge in sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2016-06-22 | 2014-01-29 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4616 x 3464 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Total lenses | 4 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | no built-in flash | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lb) | 218g (0.48 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Launch cost | $6,495 | $250 |