Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax K200D
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
61 Imaging
50 Features
41 Overall
46
Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2016
- Replacement is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Launched September 2008
- Superseded the Pentax K100D S
Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax K200D Overview
Here is a complete review of the Hasselblad X1D versus Pentax K200D, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Hasselblad and Pentax. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and K200D (10MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and K200D (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's DominanceThe X1D was manufactured 7 years later than the K200D and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the X1D scores vs the K200D in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax K200D Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D & Pentax K200D. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Pentax K200D
X1D | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2016 | September 2008 | Fresher by 96 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Hasselblad X1D
K200D | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Pentax K200D
X1D | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D has outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Pentax K200D has sizing of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") along with a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X1D versus Pentax K200D in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the X1D and the K200D.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and K200D is 60 and 61 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing specs. The visual here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and K200D.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The X1D due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D will show extra detail due to its extra 41MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher X1D should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Pentax |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Pentax K200D |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2016-06-22 | 2008-09-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 4 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 690 gr (1.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Retail cost | $6,495 | $600 |