Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2016
- Successor is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2012
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Hasselblad X1D versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe X1D was launched 4 years later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the X1D matches up against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
X1D | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2016 | February 2012 | More recent by 54 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Hasselblad X1D
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
X1D | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D features exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has specifications of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the X1D and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the X1D and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 60 and 69 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The X1D due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer X1D should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-06-22 | 2012-02-02 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Total lenses | 4 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.3 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 550 gr (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Retail price | $6,495 | $871 |