Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
88 Imaging
53 Features
37 Overall
46
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2016
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Launched September 2010
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's DominanceThe X1D was brought out 5 years later than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the X1D scores versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The entire galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
X1D | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2016 | September 2010 | More recent by 71 months | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Hasselblad X1D
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
X1D | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D enjoys external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the X1D vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 60 and 88 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Clearly, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The X1D featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D will result in extra detail having its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer X1D should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-06-22 | 2010-09-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Amount of lenses | 4 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 140 gr (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Launch price | $6,495 | $566 |