Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
85 Imaging
34 Features
48 Overall
39
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Replacement is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Released August 2010
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Hasselblad X1D versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe X1D was announced 5 years after the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the X1D scores against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The whole galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
X1D | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2016 | August 2010 | More modern by 72 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Hasselblad X1D
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
X1D | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D provides physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has proportions of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the X1D vs the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 60 and 85 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through specifications. The image below should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X1D using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D will render extra detail with its extra 41 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger X1D will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-06-22 | 2010-08-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 4 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.3 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 367g (0.81 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Pricing at release | $6,495 | $147 |