Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2016
- Newer Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Introduced March 2010
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Hasselblad X1D versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe X1D was announced 6 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the X1D matches up versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The whole galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
X1D | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2016 | March 2010 | More modern by 77 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Hasselblad X1D
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
X1D | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D enjoys physical dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the X1D and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 60 and 85 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The pic below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X1D with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D will give you more detail with its extra 41 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent X1D is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2016-06-22 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Medium format | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 4 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.3 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 355 grams (0.78 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Launch price | $6,495 | $349 |