Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
92 Imaging
38 Features
17 Overall
29
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Kodak C135 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the C135 (14MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the C135 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe C135 was announced 23 months later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Kodak C135 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the C135 matches up versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C135 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak C135 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
C135 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | March 2010 | Fresher by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Kodak C135
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | C135 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 112k | Clearer display (+808k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
C135 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak C135 comes with physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Kodak C135 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the C135 versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C135 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 92 and 85 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C135 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The C135 having a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Kodak C135 will provide extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more modern C135 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Kodak EasyShare C135 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1250 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.4" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 112k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 180 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lb) | 355 gr (0.78 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $349 |