Clicky

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
92
Imaging
38
Features
17
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2012
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Photography Glossary

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Kodak C135 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the C135 (14MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the C135 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The C135 was announced 23 months later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Kodak C135 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the C135 matches up versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 C135 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
ReleasedJanuary 2012March 2010Fresher by 23 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Kodak C135

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC C135 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display dimensions3"2.4"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution920k112kClearer display (+808k dot)

Common features in the Kodak C135 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 C135 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak C135 comes with physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

See the Kodak C135 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the C135 versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C135 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 92 and 85 respectively.

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C135 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

As you can tell, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The C135 having a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Kodak C135 will provide extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more modern C135 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Portrait photography camera
34
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
includes face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
36
you can focus manually
supports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak C135 Street photography advice
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography advice
53
environment proof
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
maximum ISO low (1,250)
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition (355 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak C135 Sports photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography features
31
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
environment proof
fixed focal length (35mm)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have liveview
slow frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
has no phase detect autofocus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Kodak C135 Travel photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography features
64
environment proof
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.0)
60
lighter than competition (355g)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak C135
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
32
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
environment proof
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.4")
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,250)
does not have RAW format
missing Timelapse function
47
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
25
includes face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone socket
28
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (355g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C135 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Kodak EasyShare C135Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Ricoh
Model Kodak EasyShare C135 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2012-01-10 2010-03-18
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1250 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35mm (1x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.4" 3"
Screen resolution 112k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 180 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) 4.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 gr (0.39 lb) 355 gr (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 photographs
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $0 $349