Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ15W
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Announced February 2009
- Additionally Known as WB550
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ15W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. The resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the HZ15W (12MP) is relatively well matched and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe C135 was launched 2 years later than the HZ15W and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the C135 matches up vs the HZ15W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Samsung HZ15W. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak C135 Gallery & Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Samsung HZ15W
| C135 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Kodak C135
| HZ15W | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Sharper screen (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Samsung HZ15W
| C135 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C135 has outside dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung HZ15W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ15W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the C135 vs the HZ15W.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C135 and HZ15W is 92 and 90 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the C135 and HZ15W.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Kodak C135 to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger C135 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Samsung HZ15W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Samsung HZ15W |
| Also called as | - | WB550 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1250 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.4 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 112k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lb) | 249 grams (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $330 |