Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-400
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-400 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-400, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the C140 (8MP) and the E-400 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the C140 (1/2.5") and E-400 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe C140 was announced 2 years after the E-400 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak C140 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the C140 matches up vs the E-400 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-400 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Olympus E-400. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery and Olympus E-400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus E-400
| C140 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2009 |  | September 2006 | Newer by 29 months |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Kodak C140
| E-400 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus E-400
| C140 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-400 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C140 comes with exterior measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus E-400 has dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Look at the Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-400 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the C140 against the E-400.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and E-400 is 94 and 77 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-400 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The pic underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the C140 and E-400.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The C140 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Olympus E-400 will resolve greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer C140 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-400 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-400 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus E-400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus E-400 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2006-09-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 13cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 45 |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 215 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) | 435 gr (0.96 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $80 | $599 |
