Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Kodak C140 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe C140 was manufactured 4 years prior to the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the C140 scores vs the TG-820 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak C140 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| C140 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Kodak C140
| TG-820 iHS | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 37 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| C140 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 enjoys outer dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Kodak C140 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the C140 against the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and TG-820 iHS is 94 and 92 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The C140 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will produce greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 13cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $80 | $500 |
