Clicky

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-50

Portability
94
Imaging
31
Features
10
Overall
22
Kodak EasyShare C140 front
 
Ricoh WG-50 front
Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs

Kodak C140
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
  • 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2009
Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Launched May 2017
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview

Below is a in-depth analysis of the Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-50, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WG-50 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The C140 was announced 9 years earlier than the WG-50 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the C140 scores against the WG-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Ricoh WG-50

 C140 WG-50 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Kodak C140

 WG-50 C140 
LaunchedMay 2017January 2009More recent by 101 months
Focus manually Dial exact focus

Common features in the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-50

 C140 WG-50 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent display measurement
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Kodak C140 has got outside dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Examine the Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the C140 compared to the WG-50.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and WG-50 is 94 and 91 respectively.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and WG-50.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The C140 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Ricoh WG-50 will render greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The older C140 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C140 Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-50 Portrait photography details
18
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
42
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Kodak C140 Street photography highlights
Ricoh WG-50 Street photography highlights
46
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
low max ISO (1,000)
62
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak C140
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-50
15
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect AF
49
has image stabilization (Digital)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
weather sealing
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Kodak C140 Travel photography info
Ricoh WG-50 Travel photography info
50
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
71
weather sealing
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Kodak C140 Landscape photography details
Ricoh WG-50 Landscape photography details
21
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
low max ISO (1,000)
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
48
you can focus manually
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C140 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh WG-50 Vlogging highlights
21
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
33
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
includes face detect focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-50
 Kodak EasyShare C140Ricoh WG-50
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Ricoh
Model type Kodak EasyShare C140 Ricoh WG-50
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2009-01-08 2017-05-24
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1000 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.7-4.8 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range 13cm 1cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off On, off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 160g (0.35 pounds) 193g (0.43 pounds)
Dimensions 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID 2 x AA D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $80 $280