Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Leica M10

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Leica M10 front
Portability
75
Imaging
73
Features
45
Overall
61

Kodak M320 vs Leica M10 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2009
Leica M10
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 50000
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 660g - 139 x 80 x 39mm
  • Released January 2017
  • Newer Model is Leica M11
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M320 vs Leica M10 Overview

Lets look closer at the Kodak M320 and Leica M10, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Kodak and Leica. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and M10 (24MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and M10 (Full frame) boast different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M320 was revealed 9 years prior to the M10 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Leica M10 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the M320 scores vs the M10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Leica M10

 M320 M10 

Reasons to pick Leica M10 over the Kodak M320

 M10 M320 
ReleasedJanuary 2017January 2009More recent by 97 months
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kClearer screen (+807k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Leica M10

 M320 M10 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Kodak M320 vs Leica M10 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 offers physical measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Leica M10 has measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).

Check out the Kodak M320 and Leica M10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the M320 compared to the M10.

Kodak M320 vs Leica M10 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the M320 and M10 is 95 and 75 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Leica M10 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Leica M10 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and M10.

Clearly, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M320 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Leica M10 will produce extra detail because of its extra 15 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Leica M10 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Leica M10 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Leica M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography advice
Leica M10 Portrait photography advice
19
no manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
83
has manual focus
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography highlights
Leica M10 Street photography highlights
47
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competitors (155g)
69
big sensor size (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
above average high ISO (50,000)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography features
Leica M10 Sports photography features
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
has no phase detect AF
53
decent megapixels (24MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
bad battery pack (210 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography details
Leica M10 Travel photography details
50
has built in flash
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors (155g)
megapixel count low (9MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
57
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
bad battery pack (210 CIPA)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography factors
Leica M10 Landscape photography factors
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
no Timelapse function
75
has manual focus
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
above average high ISO (50,000)
supports RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
bad battery pack (210 per charge)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging advice
Leica M10 Vlogging advice
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
no external microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (155g)
9
can't record video
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Kodak M320 vs Leica M10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Leica M10
 Kodak EasyShare M320Leica M10
General Information
Brand Kodak Leica
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Leica M10
Class Ultracompact Pro Mirrorless
Launched 2009-01-08 2017-01-18
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Maestro II
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 35.8 x 23.9mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 855.6mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 24MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Peak resolution 3472 x 2604 5952 x 3992
Highest native ISO 1600 50000
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Leica M
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.8-5.1 -
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Number of lenses - 59
Crop factor 6.3 1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 1,037 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (rangefinder)
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155g (0.34 lbs) 660g (1.46 lbs)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 139 x 80 x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 86
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 24.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 2133
Other
Battery life - 210 images
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $39 $7,595