Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S6200 front
Portability
94
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Nikon S6200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
  • 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
  • Released August 2011
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Kodak M320 and Nikon S6200, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Nikon. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and S6200 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and S6200 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

The M320 was released 3 years prior to the S6200 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Nikon S6200 being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the M320 grades versus the S6200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Nikon S6200

 M320 S6200 

Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Kodak M320

 S6200 M320 
ReleasedAugust 2011January 2009More recent by 31 months
Focus manually Dial precise focusing

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Nikon S6200

 M320 S6200 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display size
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 has got outside measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Nikon S6200 has sizing of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M320 and Nikon S6200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the M320 compared to the S6200.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and S6200 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and S6200.

Plainly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M320 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Nikon S6200 will produce more detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography information
Nikon S6200 Portrait photography information
19
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
resolution not great (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
40
manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography info
Nikon S6200 Street photography info
47
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than average in class (155 grams)
63
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes touch focus
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography factors
Nikon S6200 Sports photography factors
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
max fps low (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Nikon S6200 as a Travel photography camera
50
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than average in class (155g)
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
70
includes touch focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
great zoom (250mm)
missing Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Landscape photography camera
Nikon S6200 as a Landscape photography camera
22
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
resolution not great (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
43
manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging highlights
Nikon S6200 Vlogging highlights
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have mic socket
heavier than average in class (155 grams)
31
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone socket
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Nikon S6200
 Kodak EasyShare M320Nikon Coolpix S6200
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Nikon
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Nikon Coolpix S6200
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2011-08-24
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Expeed C2
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 25 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 25-250mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.2-5.6
Macro focus distance 10cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lb) 160 gr (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 250 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7001 EN-EL12
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $39 $229