Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Released August 2011
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Kodak M320 and Nikon S6200, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Nikon. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and S6200 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and S6200 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or MThe M320 was released 3 years prior to the S6200 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Nikon S6200 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the M320 grades versus the S6200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Nikon Coolpix S6200. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M320 Gallery and Nikon S6200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Nikon S6200
M320 | S6200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Kodak M320
S6200 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 31 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Nikon S6200
M320 | S6200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display size | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 has got outside measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Nikon S6200 has sizing of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M320 and Nikon S6200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the M320 compared to the S6200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and S6200 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and S6200.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M320 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Nikon S6200 will produce more detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6200 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Nikon |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Nikon Coolpix S6200 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-08-24 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.2-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 160 gr (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7001 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $39 | $229 |