Kodak M320 vs Pentax Q-S1
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Kodak M320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak M320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Kodak M320 versus Pentax Q-S1, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Kodak and Pentax. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M320 was launched 6 years earlier than the Q-S1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the M320 matches up versus the Q-S1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Kodak M320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Pentax Q-S1. The complete galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Pentax Q-S1
| M320 | Q-S1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Kodak M320
| Q-S1 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2014 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 67 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Pentax Q-S1
| M320 | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 has got physical measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Pentax Q-S1 has proportions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Kodak M320 versus Pentax Q-S1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the M320 versus the Q-S1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and Q-S1 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and Q-S1.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M320 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Pentax Q-S1 will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak M320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak M320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Pentax |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Pentax Q-S1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2014-08-04 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Q Engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
| Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 203g (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $39 | $250 |
