Kodak M320 vs Samsung NX100
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
88 Imaging
55 Features
54 Overall
54
Kodak M320 vs Samsung NX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 282g - 120 x 71 x 35mm
- Revealed September 2010
- Replacement is Samsung NX200
Kodak M320 vs Samsung NX100 Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Kodak M320 and Samsung NX100, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Kodak and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and NX100 (15MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and NX100 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe M320 was introduced 20 months earlier than the NX100 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the M320 matches up versus the NX100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung NX100 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Samsung NX100. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak M320 Gallery & Samsung NX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung NX100
M320 | NX100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX100 over the Kodak M320
NX100 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2010 | January 2009 | Fresher by 20 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung NX100
M320 | NX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Kodak M320 vs Samsung NX100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 offers physical dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX100 has sizing of 120mm x 71mm x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 282 grams (0.62 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M320 and Samsung NX100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the M320 against the NX100.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the M320 and NX100 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung NX100 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing only by going through specs. The photograph below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and NX100.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M320 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung NX100 will provide greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung NX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M320 vs Samsung NX100 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung NX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Samsung |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung NX100 |
Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2010-09-14 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | DRIMe Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | - |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | VGA AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 282g (0.62 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 120 x 71 x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 62 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 563 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7001 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $39 | $386 |