Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST65

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Announced January 2009
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2011
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and ST65 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and ST65 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.

Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

The M320 was unveiled 24 months earlier than the ST65 making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the M320 grades against the ST65 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung ST65

 M320 ST65 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Kodak M320

 ST65 M320 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011January 2009More modern by 24 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST65

 M320 ST65 
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 provides exterior dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST65 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the M320 and the ST65.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and ST65 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over specs. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and ST65.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M320 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Samsung ST65 will offer extra detail having an extra 5MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Portrait photography camera
19
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
MP count low (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
28
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Street photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Street photography camera
47
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
heavier than competition in class (155g)
49
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low maximum ISO (0)
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M320
Sports photography with Samsung ST65
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect AF
26
MP count good (14 megapixels)
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M320
Travel photography with Samsung ST65
50
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (155g)
MP count low (9MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
71
MP count good (14MP)
built-in flash
good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly display
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography features
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography features
22
lack of manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
37
good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3")
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (0)
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging information
Samsung ST65 Vlogging information
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (155g)
27
good maximum aperture (f)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone jack
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Samsung ST65
 Kodak EasyShare M320Samsung ST65
General Information
Brand Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Samsung ST65
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-08 2011-01-19
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 80 -
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 25 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) ()
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.1 -
Macro focusing range 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lbs) -
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $39 $130