Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Kodak and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and Quattro (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durabilityThe M320 was unveiled 8 years earlier than the Quattro which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the M320 scores against the Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Sigma sd Quattro. The full galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sigma Quattro
M320 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Kodak M320
Quattro | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | January 2009 | More modern by 86 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sigma Quattro
M320 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Kodak M320 enjoys outer dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
See the Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the M320 versus the Quattro.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and Quattro is 95 and 63 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and Quattro.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M320 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro will give you greater detail having an extra 20 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Sigma |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 29MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.8 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | - |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 625 grams (1.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $39 | $738 |