Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Released February 2016
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Kodak and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and Quattro (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.

Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

The M320 was unveiled 8 years earlier than the Quattro which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the M320 scores against the Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sigma Quattro

 M320 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Kodak M320

 Quattro M320 
ReleasedFebruary 2016January 2009More modern by 86 months
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1620k230kSharper screen (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sigma Quattro

 M320 Quattro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Kodak M320 enjoys outer dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

See the Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the M320 versus the Quattro.

Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and Quattro is 95 and 63 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and Quattro.

As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M320 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro will give you greater detail having an extra 20 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography info
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography info
19
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
81
focusing manually
excellent MP (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Street photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Street photography camera
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
heavier than average (155g)
59
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
heavier than competitors (625 grams)
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography info
Sigma Quattro Sports photography info
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect AF
70
excellent MP (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
comes with phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.8 fps)
no image stabilization
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Travel photography highlights
50
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than average (155g)
resolution not great (9MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
55
weather sealing
excellent MP (29 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (625 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
22
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
72
focusing manually
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
excellent MP (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
weather sealing
no image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging features
Sigma Quattro Vlogging features
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic support
heavier than average (155 grams)
22
has face detection autofocus
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video ( resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
heavier than competitors (625 grams)
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Kodak M320 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sigma Quattro
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Company Kodak Sigma
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Sigma sd Quattro
Category Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2009-01-08 2016-02-23
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.5" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 29MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3472 x 2604 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) -
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.1 -
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Amount of lenses - 76
Crop factor 6.3 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 3.8 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 -
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lb) 625 grams (1.38 lb)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $39 $738