Kodak M320 vs Sony HX10V
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
91 Imaging
42 Features
46 Overall
43
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX10V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-400mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 234g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
- Released February 2012
- Successor is Sony HX20V
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX10V Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Kodak M320 vs Sony HX10V, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Kodak and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and HX10V (18MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and HX10V (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth FilmingThe M320 was manufactured 4 years prior to the HX10V and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony HX10V being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the M320 matches up against the HX10V for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX10V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M320 Gallery & Sony HX10V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony HX10V
M320 | HX10V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX10V over the Kodak M320
HX10V | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | January 2009 | More recent by 38 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony HX10V
M320 | HX10V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX10V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 offers physical measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony HX10V has sizing of 105mm x 60mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M320 vs Sony HX10V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the M320 and the HX10V.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the M320 and HX10V is 95 and 91 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX10V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and HX10V.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M320 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony HX10V will resolve extra detail due to its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older M320 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX10V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX10V Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Sony |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 24-400mm (16.7x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 234 gr (0.52 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $39 | $616 |