Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
47
Features
51
Overall
48

Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2009
Sony HX350
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
  • Released December 2016
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Overview

Below, we will be looking at the Kodak M320 and Sony HX350, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and HX350 (20MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and HX350 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M320 was unveiled 9 years prior to the HX350 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the M320 grades versus the HX350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony HX350

 M320 HX350 

Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Kodak M320

 HX350 M320 
ReleasedDecember 2016January 2009More modern by 96 months
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution922k230kCrisper screen (+692k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony HX350

 M320 HX350 
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 has got exterior dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony HX350 has measurements of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") along with a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M320 and Sony HX350 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the M320 compared to the HX350.

Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and HX350 is 95 and 62 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through technical specs. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and HX350.

As you can tell, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M320 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF harder and the Sony HX350 will result in extra detail having an extra 11MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be behind in sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography details
Sony HX350 Portrait photography details
19
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
low resolution (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
48
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
has face detect focus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography information
Sony HX350 Street photography information
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
heavier than competition in class (155g)
50
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (652 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M320
Sports photography with Sony HX350
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect autofocus
53
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX350 as a Travel photography camera
50
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (155 grams)
low resolution (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
54
good resolution (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (652 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony HX350 as a Landscape photography camera
22
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
50
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
Sony HX350 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than competition in class (155 grams)
27
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
does not have microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (652 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony HX350
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350
General Information
Make Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-01-08 2016-12-20
Body design Ultracompact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor - BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3472 x 2604 5184 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Highest boosted ISO - 12800
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/2.8-6.3
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 202 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 8.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lb) 652 gr (1.44 lb)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $39 -