Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
62 Imaging
47 Features
51 Overall
48
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Released December 2016
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Kodak M320 and Sony HX350, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and HX350 (20MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and HX350 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M320 was unveiled 9 years prior to the HX350 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the M320 grades versus the HX350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak M320 Gallery and Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony HX350
M320 | HX350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Kodak M320
HX350 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2016 | January 2009 | More modern by 96 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony HX350
M320 | HX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 has got exterior dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony HX350 has measurements of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") along with a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M320 and Sony HX350 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the M320 compared to the HX350.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and HX350 is 95 and 62 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through technical specs. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and HX350.
As you can tell, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M320 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF harder and the Sony HX350 will result in extra detail having an extra 11MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M320 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Sony |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2016-12-20 |
Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 5184 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 652 gr (1.44 lb) |
Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7001 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $39 | - |