Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900
96 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Launched February 2015
- Previous Model is Nikon S9700
Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Kodak M340 versus Nikon S9900, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Nikon. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the M340 (10MP) and S9900 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M340 was introduced 7 years prior to the S9900 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Kodak M340 being a Ultracompact camera and the Nikon S9900 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the M340 scores against the S9900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M340 and Nikon Coolpix S9900. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak M340 Gallery and Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Nikon S9900
M340 | S9900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Kodak M340
S9900 | M340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | January 2009 | Newer by 74 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Kodak M340 and Nikon S9900
M340 | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak M340 offers physical dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) and the Nikon S9900 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Look at the Kodak M340 versus Nikon S9900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the M340 versus the S9900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the M340 and S9900 is 96 and 88 respectively.
Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through a spec sheet. The image here should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M340 and S9900.
Clearly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Nikon S9900 to resolve extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged M340 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M340 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Nikon |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M340 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-01-05 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3664 x 2748 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 5 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.7 | f/3.7-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 115g (0.25 lb) | 289g (0.64 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7001 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $130 | $300 |