Clicky

Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S9900 front
Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
60
Overall
48

Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs

Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
  • 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
  • Launched February 2015
  • Previous Model is Nikon S9700
Photography Glossary

Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Overview

On this page, we will be matching up the Kodak M340 versus Nikon S9900, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Nikon. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the M340 (10MP) and S9900 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The M340 was introduced 7 years prior to the S9900 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Kodak M340 being a Ultracompact camera and the Nikon S9900 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the M340 scores against the S9900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Nikon S9900

 M340 S9900 

Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Kodak M340

 S9900 M340 
LaunchedFebruary 2015January 2009Newer by 74 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kClearer screen (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Kodak M340 and Nikon S9900

 M340 S9900 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak M340 offers physical dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) and the Nikon S9900 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).

Look at the Kodak M340 versus Nikon S9900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the M340 versus the S9900.

Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the M340 and S9900 is 96 and 88 respectively.

Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through a spec sheet. The image here should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M340 and S9900.

Clearly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Nikon S9900 to resolve extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged M340 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 sensor size comparison

Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Portrait photography camera
Nikon S9900 as a Portrait photography camera
19
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
37
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
includes face detection focusing
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Street photography camera
Nikon S9900 as a Street photography camera
47
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
68
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (289g)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Kodak M340 Sports photography details
Nikon S9900 Sports photography details
16
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
53
great zoom range (25-750mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Kodak M340 Travel photography highlights
Nikon S9900 Travel photography highlights
51
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
77
lighter than competition (289g)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (750mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Landscape photography camera
Nikon S9900 as a Landscape photography camera
22
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
47
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M340 Vlogging information
Nikon S9900 Vlogging information
22
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic jack
73
rather wide (25mm)
selfie friendly display
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (289g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
lack of external microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M340 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M340 and Nikon S9900
 Kodak EasyShare M340Nikon Coolpix S9900
General Information
Company Kodak Nikon
Model Kodak EasyShare M340 Nikon Coolpix S9900
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-01-05 2015-02-10
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 3664 x 2748 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 5 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 25-750mm (30.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.7 f/3.7-6.4
Macro focus distance 7cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 7.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 6.00 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 115g (0.25 lb) 289g (0.64 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7001 EN-EL19
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $130 $300